Solution Lab III

Task

Participants

3 / 3

Each participant owns one candidate polygon and score column.

Reference flood

1999 historical floodRCP4.5 / SSP1 / 2030 reference 2020 exceptionally large floodRCP4.5 / SSP1 / 2030 reference 2022 major floodRCP4.5 / SSP1 / 2030 reference

Active layers

Flood depth LUP 2030 Commune boundaries Road access proxy

Prototype scope. Open participant views in separate tabs to test live local collaboration. Multi-device accounts and server persistence are not yet enabled.

Loading curated workshop layers...

Three candidate sites are ready for comparison.

Joint review

Decision matrix

Prototype scale: 1 = least suitable, 5 = most suitable. Weights must total 100% before a recommendation is shown.

Criteria	Weight (%)	Site CD	Site ID	Site ED
1. Safety of the area	20%
Flood safetySelected reference flood
2. Negative impact on other land uses during construction	20%
Land-use conflictLUP 2030 compatibility
Environmental sensitivityPotential environmental impact
3. Feasibility of development	60%
Proximity and access to facilitiesRelative accessibility
Infrastructure availabilityRoad and service context
Transport connectivity and mobilityNetwork connection
Socioeconomic factorsIndicative social and economic fit
Weighted total	100%	-	-	-

Preliminary recommendation

Site ID

Highest current weighted score

Key trade-offs