Solution Lab III

Meeting setup

Task

Participants

3 / 3

Each participant owns one candidate polygon; its evidence column recalculates for everyone.

Reference flood model

1999 historical floodRCP4.5 / SSP1 / 2030 reference 2020 exceptionally large floodRCP4.5 / SSP1 / 2030 reference 2022 major floodRCP4.5 / SSP1 / 2030 reference

All available flood models 24

Scenario used for flood analysis

The map can display the high-resolution service; calculations use the documented compact analytical raster.

Map context

Commune boundaries

Evidence layers are linked directly to the matrix. Open a criterion to inspect or show its datasets.

Transparent prototype scoring. Open participant views in separate tabs for live local collaboration. Spatial scores use documented provisional thresholds; partial evidence is labelled. Multi-device accounts and server persistence are not yet enabled.

Loading curated workshop layers...

Three candidate sites are ready for comparison.

Map legend

Candidate sites

Site CD
Site ID
Site ED

Joint review

Decision matrix

Spatial screening scale: 1 = least suitable, 5 = most suitable. Calculated scores use transparent provisional thresholds and show source coverage and confidence.

Preparing spatial evidence Loading the analysis catalog…

Criterion and evidence	Weight (%)	Site CD	Site ID	Site ED
1. Safety of the area	20%
Flood safetySelected flood depth model Waiting

2. Negative impact on other land uses during construction	20%
Land-use conflictLUP 2030 compatibility Waiting

Environmental sensitivityLand cover and terrain proxies Waiting

3. Feasibility of development	60%
Walking-time access to facilities30 m network travel-time surfaces and source points Waiting

Infrastructure availabilityRoad and open-service proxies Waiting

Transport connectivity and mobilityRoad network and public transport Waiting

Socioeconomic factorsPopulation and development-pressure proxy Waiting

Weighted total	100% active	-	-	-

Provisional spatial screening

Calculating

Waiting for spatial evidence

Key trade-offs